Portal de Caravaca de la Cruz
www.portaldecaravaca.com
Councilor for Urban Planning, Works, Agriculture, Livestock and the Environment |
The decision of the socialist government team not to pay the invoice of € 59,290 for the asphalting of two roads adjacent to the industrial estate of Cavila, until it is determined who are the owners of such land, and the knowledge of the facts to the Ministry Prosecutor, who is the one who finally filed a complaint with the court, has already provoked the request by the PP for two extraordinary plenary sessions and several press conferences.
And that denotes his nervousness.
The difficult decision not to pay the bill was taken to defend the interests of citizens, which is our duty, and not to incur a possible prevarication and / or misappropriation of public funds because we understood and continue to understand that the work had been done on private roads, as demonstrated in the plenary session of October 11, in which Mr. Villa was not able to state the contrary, since the availability of the vials was never proven despite the warning of the technicians in whose memory (section I.5) stated: "In addition, the availability of the land occupied by these service roads must be proven prior to the execution of this work".
Well, in a few days, without the availability of land and without any municipal control in the execution of the work, this was carried out.
If it was really a municipal work, why was not the municipal technicians instructed to take the direction of the work?
There is no initial stakeout certificate, nor work certificates, nor reception certificate;
nor does it include the execution of safety and health measures and waste management.
In the judgment of the Court of Contentious Administrative n ° 7 of Murcia, before the lawsuit filed by the company that made the work, it has been proved that the municipal government acted correctly: "I must dismiss and dismiss the claim filed by the procedural representation of the merchant who did the work to understand that the resolution of the mayor's office is adjusted to right ... "that is, according to the judge, the mayor did the right thing when he decided not to pay the bill until it is shown whether the land was public or not .
There are more alleged irregularities, six days before the PP lost the elections in Caravaca, in the Local Government Board, of May 18, 2015, the valued report was approved in the amount of 68,685'80 € + VAT (major contract) and applied, in the same act, with a price reduction of € 19,686 awarded for the amount of € 49,000 + VAT (minor contract) also pretending the existence of three offers, when in reality only two had been submitted because the third was submitted to the next day;
therefore, despite being a negotiated procedure, the one of a minor contract was used crudely to award, in a short time, before the end of its mandate.
With the false and puerile assertion that the decrease in the cost of the works was due to the fact that the owners assumed the cost of the works of the graveling platform, Mr. Villa intentionally tries to deceive the citizens since the valued memory does not it includes the works of preparation of the platform, as it is expressly mentioned in section I.5 that says "... a base must be executed that is adequate to the traffic foreseen in the area and that is not the object of the present project ..."
On the other hand, it is worth knowing that the invoice in question is one more of the package that, for the amount of more than 1.7 million euros were approved by the unemployed mayor of the PP just after the cash settlement of 3'2 million euros , just the day before the inauguration of the current socialist mayor Pepe Moreno.
Let each one draw their own conclusions.
Of the complaint filed by the Public Prosecutor, the judge of Court No. 3 of Caravaca ordered provisional dismissal, that is, it has no definitive character, because it has not been possible to determine whether the lands are, or are not, municipal property.
Therefore, we understand that it will be necessary to continue investigating to determine the ownership of the same and, as the case may be, that the Prior Proceedings will be reopened.
As for the legal costs of this procedure, which has cost nothing and probably will not cost the City Council, it is surprising that the PP now worries when it has never shown any interest in the costs of so many judicial proceedings of which, currently , the City of Caravaca de la Cruz must be defended as a result of 16 years of disastrous management.
Regarding the damage to honor, it should be made clear that our Municipal Government has always acted with the utmost discretion, in this and other judicial matters, unlike the PP, in its desire to discredit the Mayor Pepe Moreno and deteriorate the good image of the socialist government, does not stop to make visible in the plenary sessions and in the media the possible loss of prestige of the people of his party that it seems to care for and defend.
Source: Ayuntamiento de Caravaca de la Cruz
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies